Volume-1, Issue-1

1. Introduction

SCAD is an acute cardiovascular condition characterized by the tearing of the coronary artery wall, leading to myocardial infarction, arrhythmias, or sudden cardiac death (Matta et al., 2023). Although SCAD accounts for a small percentage of acute coronary syndromes, it disproportionately affects younger women and is often underdiagnosed or misdiagnosed (Brunton et al., 2024; Lewey et al., 2022; Murphy et al 2024a). Beyond its physiological impact, SCAD has profound psychosocial implications, with survivors frequently reporting anxiety, depression, PTSD, and diminished QoL (Dang et al., 2023). Despite these challenges, behavioral health innovations remain underdeveloped for this unique patient population.

2. Epidemiology and Psychosocial Burden of SCAD

Epidemiological Insights

SCAD predominantly affects women, particularly those aged 30 to 50 (Natarajan & Day, 2024). Hormonal fluctuations, such as those occurring during pregnancy or menopause, have been strongly linked to its onset (DiFusco et al., 2021). Although the precise etiology of SCAD remains elusive, emerging evidence points to a multifactorial origin involving genetic predispositions, inflammatory processes, and stress-induced arterial damage (Lewey et al., 2022). Genetic studies have begun identifying specific markers that may increase susceptibility, while the role of environmental and lifestyle factors in exacerbating these risks remains an area of active investigation (Murugiah et al., 2022; Würdinger et al., 2023). Furthermore, advances in non-invasive imaging techniques, such as high-resolution coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound, have significantly improved diagnostic precision, revealing that SCAD may be more prevalent than previously recognized (Würdinger et al., 2023). These findings emphasize the need for increased awareness among clinicians and greater emphasis on early detection and targeted interventions to improve outcomes for SCAD patients.

Behavioral and Psychological Impacts

The psychosocial burden of SCAD is profound, with survivors often grappling with a complex interplay of emotional, cognitive, and social challenges (Murugiah et al., 2022; Sumner et al., 2024). Anxiety, depression, and PTSD are prevalent, stemming not only from the acute trauma of the cardiac event but also from the uncertainty surrounding SCAD's recurrence and long-term prognosis (Murugiah et al., 2022; Sumner et al., 2024). Many survivors report persistent cognitive impairments, commonly referred to as "brain fog," which manifest as difficulties with concentration, memory, and decision-making, further hindering their ability to return to pre-SCAD levels of functioning (Weddell et al., 2024). Physical fatigue often exacerbates these cognitive struggles, creating a cycle of diminished energy and reduced productivity.

Beyond the individual experience, SCAD significantly disrupts social and occupational roles. Survivors frequently encounter barriers to resuming professional responsibilities, managing household duties, and maintaining relationships (Murphy et al., 2024b). Feelings of isolation and frustration can arise as they navigate the complexities of recovery while addressing the emotional toll on family dynamics (Murphy et al., 2024b). Fear of recurrence looms large, influencing survivors' willingness to engage in physical activity or other routine behaviors, which can hinder rehabilitation efforts. These multifaceted impacts highlight the critical need for integrated behavioral health support to address the emotional, cognitive, and social dimensions of SCAD recovery, fostering resilience and improving QoL (Murphy et al., 2024b).

3. Innovations in Behavioral Health Interventions

Integrated Care Models

Integrated care models are increasingly recognized as essential for addressing the complex needs of SCAD survivors, as they integrate physical health management with psychological and emotional support (Rogerson et al., 2023). These models underscore the intricate interplay between cardiovascular health and mental well-being, acknowledging that recovery requires a comprehensive approach (Sumner et al., 2024). Programs have demonstrated the effectiveness of telehealth interventions in cardiac populations by providing accessible, structured behavioral and psychological support, which can lead to significant improvements in mental health outcomes (Rogerson et al., 2023). However, while these programs have shown promise in broader cardiac care settings, their adaptation to the unique needs of SCAD survivors—who face challenges like recurrence fears and psychosocial impacts— requires further research and validation (Murphy et al., 2024b).

Beyond telehealth, integrated care models could be enhanced by incorporating multidisciplinary teams comprising cardiologists, behavioral health specialists, and rehabilitation experts working collaboratively to develop personalized care plans (Murugiah et al., 2022). Additionally, these models could utilize patient-centered tools, such as mobile health applications, to support continuous monitoring, encourage adherence to self-management strategies, and provide real-time emotional support (Weddell et al., 2024). To be truly effective, cultural competence and inclusivity must be prioritized to ensure interventions meet the needs of diverse SCAD survivor populations (Di Fusco et al., 2021). As research continues to explore the multifaceted nature of SCAD recovery, refining and tailoring integrated care approaches will remain crucial for addressing the physical, emotional, and social dimensions of survivorship (Würdinger et al., 2023).

Digital Health Solutions

Digital health platforms, such as mobile applications and telemedicine, are increasingly being leveraged as scalable and accessible tools for providing behavioral health support to SCAD survivors. These technologies offer unique opportunities to bridge gaps in care, particularly for patients in underserved or remote areas, by delivering education, self-management strategies, and real-time support directly to users (Weddell et al., 2024). Recent systematic appraisals of online resources tailored for SCAD survivors have identified considerable variability in the quality, reliability, and accessibility of content, underscoring the need for standardized, evidence-based digital interventions (Weddell et al., 2024). 

Despite these inconsistencies, digital health tools hold significant potential for improving patient outcomes. For instance, mobile health applications can incorporate interactive features, such as symptom trackers and personalized feedback, to empower survivors in managing their health. Telemedicine platforms can facilitate ongoing communication between patients and multidisciplinary care teams, reducing barriers to accessing specialized care (Rogerson et al., 2023). Additionally, digital solutions can integrate behavioral health components, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy modules or mindfulness exercises, addressing the psychological impacts of SCAD alongside physical recovery (Murphy et al., 2024b). 

However, the successful implementation of digital health platforms requires addressing key challenges, including ensuring user engagement, maintaining data privacy, and designing culturally inclusive and linguistically appropriate content to meet the needs of diverse SCAD survivor populations (Di Fusco et al., 2021). As research continues to explore the role of digital innovations in healthcare, tailored and evidence-based digital health interventions could play a pivotal role in advancing the integrated care of SCAD survivors.

Peer Support and Community-Based Interventions

Peer support groups and community-based interventions have become increasingly recognized as vital components in addressing the psychosocial challenges faced by SCAD survivors (Murphy et al., 2024c). These initiatives provide survivors with opportunities to connect with others who have undergone similar experiences, fostering a sense of belonging and mutual understanding that can mitigate feelings of isolation and anxiety (Murphy et al., 2024c). By sharing personal narratives and coping strategies, participants often develop enhanced emotional resilience and improved coping mechanisms, which are critical to long-term recovery.

Research underscores the importance of these interventions in promoting psychological well-being. For example, community-based programs have been shown to reduce stress and depression by creating safe spaces for individuals to process their experiences and validate their emotions collectively (Weddell et al., 2024). Furthermore, peer support can complement professional healthcare services by providing consistent emotional reinforcement and practical advice, which are particularly valuable for addressing the unpredictable and often isolating nature of SCAD (Di Fusco et al., 2021).

Despite these benefits, the long-term effectiveness of peer support and community-based interventions requires further exploration. Structured evaluations are necessary to identify best practices, optimize group dynamics, and ensure inclusivity across diverse survivor populations (Murphy et al., 2024c). Additionally, integrating technology into peer support models—such as virtual groups or online forums—could expand access for those unable to participate in person, particularly survivors in rural or underserved areas (Rogerson et al., 2023). By continuing to refine and evaluate these interventions, the healthcare community can ensure that peer support and community-based approaches remain integral to the holistic care of SCAD survivors, addressing both their emotional and social needs.

4. Identifying Gaps and Challenges

Limited Behavioral Health Screening

Behavioral health screening remains a significant gap in the care of SCAD survivors, despite its importance in identifying and addressing psychological comorbidities. Routine screening for conditions such as anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has not yet been widely adopted in clinical practice, even though these issues are prevalent among SCAD patients and have profound implications for recovery (Murphy et al., 2023). The lack of standardized protocols for behavioral health assessments contributes to the underdiagnosis and undertreatment of these conditions, leaving many survivors without the support they need to manage their emotional well-being effectively. 

Research indicates that early identification of behavioral health symptoms can improve outcomes by facilitating timely interventions. For example, comprehensive screening protocols integrated into follow-up care could enable healthcare providers to identify at-risk individuals and offer tailored support, including referrals to mental health professionals or evidence-based interventions (Sumner et al., 2024). Moreover, integrating validated tools such as the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) or the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) into routine cardiac care could standardize the assessment process and help bridge the current gap in care (Di Fusco et al., 2021). 

Additionally, addressing barriers to behavioral health screening is essential for improving accessibility and equity. Many SCAD survivors, particularly those in underserved or rural areas, may lack access to mental health resources or feel stigmatized when discussing emotional challenges with their providers (Weddell et al., 2024). Training healthcare professionals to recognize the psychosocial impacts of SCAD and engage in culturally sensitive conversations can encourage survivors to disclose their mental health concerns without fear of judgment. 

As awareness of the psychological burden associated with SCAD grows, the development and implementation of routine behavioral health screening protocols will be critical in advancing survivor care. Future research should explore effective ways to integrate these assessments into existing cardiac care models, ensuring that all SCAD survivors receive holistic support that addresses both their physical and emotional needs.

Fragmented Care Delivery

SCAD survivors frequently encounter challenges within fragmented healthcare systems, where cardiology and behavioral health services operate in silos rather than through a coordinated approach (Mulvagh et al., 2023). This lack of integration often results in gaps in care, leaving many patients without adequate support to address both their cardiovascular and psychological needs. Without structured collaboration between specialties, SCAD survivors may struggle to access timely mental health interventions, which are crucial given the high prevalence of anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (Murphy et al., 2023).

One significant consequence of this fragmentation is the increased burden placed on patients to navigate multiple healthcare providers independently. SCAD survivors frequently report feeling unsupported when seeking behavioral health care, as many cardiologists may not routinely screen for psychological distress, and mental health professionals may lack familiarity with the unique medical complexities of SCAD (Sumner et al., 2024). This disconnect can delay diagnosis and treatment, exacerbating symptoms and negatively impacting overall recovery. Furthermore, the absence of standardized referral pathways and interdisciplinary communication exacerbates the challenge. Patients often experience inconsistencies in care recommendations, which can lead to confusion and reduced adherence to both medical and behavioral health interventions (Di Fusco et al., 2021). Developing integrative care pathways that facilitate collaboration between cardiologists, primary care physicians, and behavioral health specialists could help bridge these gaps and ensure that SCAD survivors receive comprehensive, patient-centered care.

Incorporating case management strategies, such as embedding behavioral health specialists within cardiology clinics or utilizing digital health tools to streamline communication between providers, could enhance coordination and improve patient outcomes. Additionally, future research should explore models of integrated care that prioritize a multidisciplinary approach, ensuring that SCAD survivors receive holistic support that addresses both their physical and emotional well-being.

Underrepresentation in Research

The underrepresentation of women, particularly those from diverse racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic backgrounds, in SCAD research remains a significant barrier to achieving equitable healthcare outcomes (Murad et al., 2024). Despite SCAD predominantly affecting women, most existing studies have focused on predominantly White, higher-income populations, limiting the applicability of findings to a broader patient demographic. This lack of diversity in research samples restricts the ability to identify potential variations in SCAD risk factors, presentation, and treatment responses across different populations. 

The exclusion of underrepresented groups in SCAD studies also contributes to health disparities by reinforcing knowledge gaps that prevent the development of tailored interventions (Di Fusco et al., 2021). Women from marginalized communities often experience delays in diagnosis due to limited awareness, systemic biases, and barriers to accessing specialized care (Natarajan & Day, 2024). Without sufficient research that includes diverse populations, medical guidelines may not adequately address the unique challenges faced by these groups, further exacerbating disparities in outcomes and treatment effectiveness.

Addressing this issue requires intentional efforts to promote inclusivity in SCAD research. Increasing recruitment efforts in historically underrepresented communities, ensuring culturally competent study designs, and prioritizing funding for studies that examine the intersection of SCAD with social determinants of health are critical steps toward achieving more representative research (Sumner et al., 2024). Additionally, expanding patient engagement in the research process through community partnerships and advocacy organizations could enhance the relevance and applicability of findings, ultimately improving care for all SCAD survivors.

5. Discussion

The existing literature highlights the necessity of comprehensive, patient-centered approaches to behavioral health in SCAD survivors. While emerging interventions, such as telehealth and integrated care models, offer potential benefits, their effectiveness in addressing the specific psychological and emotional needs of this population remains insufficiently explored. Further research is needed to refine these strategies, ensuring they are tailored to the complexities of SCAD recovery.

Additionally, systemic barriers, including inadequate care coordination and disparities in research representation, continue to hinder progress. Improving collaboration between cardiology and behavioral health providers, alongside efforts to increase inclusivity in clinical studies, is essential for advancing evidence-based, equitable care. Addressing these gaps through targeted policy changes and interdisciplinary initiatives will be critical in optimizing long-term outcomes for SCAD survivors.

Recommendations for Future Research

Future research should focus on developing tailored behavioral health interventions that address the unique psychosocial needs of SCAD survivors, ensuring relevance and effectiveness through patient-centered approaches. Longitudinal studies are essential to assess the long-term efficacy of these interventions and inform best practices. Additionally, enhancing care coordination through integrated care pathways is crucial for fostering seamless collaboration between cardiology and behavioral health providers.

Leveraging technology remains a critical area, with digital health innovations needing to prioritize accessibility, cultural competence, and user engagement to maximize their impact. Standardized care protocols that integrate cardiology and behavioral health services will further strengthen patient outcomes. Moreover, future studies must emphasize inclusivity by striving for diverse and representative samples, addressing disparities in SCAD research and ensuring equity in care. Policymakers and healthcare leaders must advocate for equitable funding and resources to support these initiatives. By advancing these research priorities, the healthcare community can better support SCAD survivors in their recovery and long-term well-being.

6. Conclusion

SCAD is a multifaceted condition that demands equally complex solutions. Innovations in behavioral health, while promising, remain in their infancy. By addressing current gaps and leveraging interdisciplinary approaches, healthcare providers and researchers can enhance the quality of life for SCAD survivors. A commitment to patient-centered care and equity will be pivotal in advancing this field. 

Funding: Not Applicable.

Data Availability Statement: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Ethical Considerations: Not Applicable

Acknowledgments: Not applicable.

Conflict of Interest: The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Declaration of generative AI in scientific writing: During the preparation of this work, the author used ChatGPT to assist in drafting and refining various sections of the manuscript. After this tool was utilized, the author reviewed and edited the content as needed and takes full responsibility for the content of the published article.

References

• Brunton, N., Patricia, Skelding, K. A., & Cendrowski, E. E. (2024). Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection (SCAD) from an Interventionalist Perspective. Current Cardiology Reports, 26, 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-023-02019-w

• Dang, Q., Murphy, B., Graham, R. M., Puri, A., Ford, S., Marschner, S., Chong, J. J. H., & Zaman, S. (2023). Patients’ perspective of quality-of-care and its correlation to quality-of-life following spontaneous coronary artery dissection. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 23(4), 400–407. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvad096

• Di Fusco, S. A., Rossini, R., Zilio, F., Pollarolo, L., di Uccio, F. S., Iorio, A., Lucà, F., Gulizia, M. M., Gabrielli, D., & Colivicchi, F. (2021). Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: Overview of pathophysiology. Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcm.2021.01.002

• Lewey, J., El Hajj, S. C., & Hayes, S. N. (2022). Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: New Insights into This Not-So-Rare Condition. Annual Review of Medicine, 73(1), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-med-052819-023826

• Matta, A., Levai, L., Elbaz, M., Nader, V., Parada, F. C., Carrié, D., & Roncalli, J. (2023). Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: A Review of Epidemiology, Pathophysiology  and Principles of Management. Current Problems in Cardiology, 48(7), 101682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.101682

• Mulvagh, S. L., Colella, T. JF., Gulati, M., Crosier, R., Allana, S., Randhawa, V. K., Bruneau, J., Pacheco, C., Jaffer, S., Cotie, L., Mensour, E., Clavel, M.-A., Hill, B., Kirkham, A. A., Foulds, H., Liblik, K., Van Damme, A., Grace, S. L., Bouchard, K., & Tulloch, H. (2023). CWHHA Atlas: Epidemiology, Diagnosis and Management of Cardiovascular Diseases in Women Chapter 9: Summary of Current Status, Challenges, Opportunities, and Recommendations. CJC Open, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2023.12.001

• Murad, M., None Khurram Sarfaraz, IrfanulQadri, M., Haider, A., Naser, N., None Layla Al Mutawa, Fawzi, H., Reem, N., & Taher, A. (2024). Breaking Down SCAD: A Deep Dive into Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection (SCAD). Journal of Medical and Health Studies, 5(4), 05-12. https://doi.org/10.32996/jmhs.2024.5.4.2

• Murphy, B. M., Le Grande, M. R., Rogerson, M. C., Hesselson, S., Iismaa, S. E., Graham, R. M., & Jackson, A. C. (2024a). Prevalence and correlates of anxiety and depressive symptoms after spontaneous coronary artery dissection: a cross-sectional study. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 23(8), 863–871. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvae071

• Murphy, B. M., Rogerson, M. C., Hesselson, S., Iismaa, S. E., Hoover, V., Michael Le Grande, Graham, R. M., & Jackson, A. C. (2023). Prevalence of Anxiety, Depression, and Distress in SCAD and Non-SCAD AMI Patients. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention, 43(5), 338–345. https://doi.org/10.1097/hcr.0000000000000782

• Murphy, B. M., Rogerson, M. C., Le Grande, M. R., Hesselson, S., Iismaa, S. E., Graham, R. M., & Jackson, A. C. (2024b). Psychosocial and lifestyle impacts of spontaneous coronary artery dissection: A quantitative study. PLoS ONE, 19(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296224

• Murugiah, K., Chen, L., Dreyer, R. P., Bouras, G., Safdar, B., Lu, Y., Spatz, E. S., Gupta, A., Khera, R., Ng, V. G., Bueno, H., Tweet, M. S., Spertus, J. A., Hayes, S. N., Lansky, A., & Krumholz, H. M. (2022). Depression and Perceived Stress After Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection and Comparison With Other Acute Myocardial Infarction (the VIRGO Experience). The American Journal of Cardiology, 173, 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.03.005

• Natarajan, P., & Day, S. M. (2024). Complex Genetic Architecture of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection. JAMA Cardiology, 9(3), 262. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2023.5201

• Rogerson, M. C., Jackson, A. C., Navaratnam, H. S., Le, M. R., Higgins, R. O., Clarke, J., & Murphy, B. M. (2023). Behavioural and psychological telehealth support for people with cardiac conditions: randomized trial of the “back on track” self-management programme. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvad034

• Sumner, J. A., Esther, Wood, M. J., Chi, G., Nolen, J., Grodzinsky, A., Gornik, H. L., Kadian Dodov, D., Wells, B. J., Hess, C. N., Lewey, J., Tam, L., Henkin, S., Orford, J., Wells, G., Kumbhani, D. J., Lindley, K. J., C. Michael Gibson, Leon, K. K., & Naderi, S. (2024). Posttraumatic Stress Disorder After Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: A Report of the International Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection Registry. Journal of the American Heart Association. Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.123.032819

• Weddell, J., Rogerson, M. C., Gallagher, R., Hesselson, S., Iismaa, S. E., Graham, R. M., Jackson, A. C., Redfern, J., Buckley, T., & Murphy, B. M. (2024). Cognitive and physical fatigue: the experience and consequences of “brain fog” after Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection (SCAD), a qualitative study. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 23(8). https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvae097

• Würdinger, M., Schweiger, V., Gilhofer, T., Cammann, V. L., Badorff, A., Koleva, I., Davide Di Vece, Niederseer, D., Candreva, A., Michel, J., Gotschy, A., Stehli, J., Stähli, B. E., Ghadri, J. R., & Templin, C. (2023). Twenty-five-year trends in incidence, angiographic appearance, and management of spontaneous coronary artery dissection. International Journal of Cardiology, 395, 131429–131429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.131429